Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:56

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
PlayStation Fans Call New PS1 Remake Announcement the "Best News This Year" - ComicBook.com
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Astronomers discover new evidence of intermediate-mass black holes - Phys.org
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Physicists Unveil New Quantum Super Material That Could Revolutionize Electronics - SciTechDaily
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supreme Court for now allows Trump to deport migrants to ‘third countries’ - The Washington Post
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
PCIe 7.0 is coming, but not soon, and not for you - The Verge